Equitable Systemic Design For Disaster Risk Reduction

[Re]Integrate

[Re]Integrate the tested prototype(s) strategically to be compatible with relevant institutional and organizational cultures, structures, workflows, decision processes, and resources.

Reasons to Use:

    • Unclear what implementation & deployment success is

    • Unsure about the viability of implementation & deployment

    • Complex implementation & deployment context

    • Transition out of and into problem-solving, future research, & standard operation

Outcomes of Success:

    • Vision, goals, objectives, & metrics for integration success

    • Confidence in viability and belief in scalability

    • Strategy for achieving inclusive evidence-driven change

    • Connection to improved research, practice, and inclusive problem-solving

Objectives of Process Steps:

1. Characterize and detail the context in which the proposed solution needs to be implemented

2. Define the vision, goals, objectives, and metrics of successful implementation

3. Assess the roles, responsibilities, resources, and timing that will enable successful implementation within the constraints of the context

4. Consider the implications of the process outcomes for future practice, research, and inclusive problem-solving

Researchers and practitioners sharing collective knowledge in meeting

Get in touch and let's talk about undesigning disasters.

Interests

12 + 2 =

Follow Us

     

Contact Us

Interests

3 + 6 =

Want more about disaster science and design?

Sign up for the Undesign Disasters newsletter. Undesign Disasters is a community publication with essays, case studies, and tools with the aim of achieving disaster justice through design.

Want more about disaster science and design?

Thank you for signing up! You'll get an email soon to confirm your subscription.